Scoring
Methodology
A review starts with a funded rupee account. The number at the top is a weighted mean, not a mood.
Test accounts
We register with Indian details, deposit in INR, place small sports and casino stakes, then withdraw. Screenshots and timestamps go into an internal log. We do not review on a press account that skips KYC.
Weights
| Bucket | Weight |
|---|---|
| Payments and KYC | 25% |
| Sports or casino product | 25% |
| Reliability and app | 15% |
| Support | 15% |
| Bonus honesty | 10% |
| Public trust clues | 10% |
Updates
Live titles get a pass at least twice a year. A cluster of similar reader complaints can trigger an early pass. We date the page when the score moves. Affiliate teams do not sit in that meeting.
What a pass looks like
Someone on the desk creates or logs into the test account on a mid-range Android and on a laptop. Deposit, a couple of cricket or table stakes, then a withdrawal. Chat is opened with a real question, not "hello bonus". Rohan times the cashier. Priya or Arjun writes the product notes. The score meeting is short and slightly grumpy, which is how you know it is working.
We do not pretend a Curacao seal is an Indian permit. That bucket can only ever be "offshore normal" or "worse than normal". A five-star fantasy does not live here.
Reader evidence
If you send a payment timeline, include dates, amounts, and the rail you used. A screenshot of a balance with no context does not move a score. A week of similar, checkable notes might.